Blogs
ALAN GILES
Alan Giles spent 20 years in bookselling with Waterstone’s and W H Smith. He retired as c.e.o. of HMV Group last year to take up non-executive and teaching roles.
A stand on brands
18.07.08
Do publishers’ brands mean anything? To celebrate its 50th birthday, the Marketing Society has selected the brands “that shone most brightly” in each of those 50 years (www.50goldenbrands.com). There isn’t a publishing brand among them.
Marketing guru Philip Kotler defined a brand as “a name, term, sign, symbol . . . designed to identify the goods or services of one seller”. But the American Marketing Association subsequently qualified this by adding “. . . and to differentiate them from those of competitors”.
That’s where most publishers fall down. Brands help simplify consumer choice, and provide the reassurance of a unique mix of benefits that satisfy the rational and emotional needs of a discrete group of buyers. Brands usually command a price premium against undifferentiated products.
Few publishing brands meet this test, although there are some notable exceptions: Penguin, Faber & Faber, and—benefiting from the halo effect of their institutions—OUP and CUP; at imprint level Virago, DK, Ladybird, Walker; and strong brands exist in reference markets such as dictionaries, atlases and travel guides.
Consumers aren’t the only audience. A well-understood brand provides clarity for booksellers, authors and their agents, and even the media. So why are publisher brands not stronger? Most marketing budgets are invested in individual titles or authors, not generically in imprints.
Does branding matter? In today’s multi-channel environment, with participants in the supply chain falling over themselves to cut each other out of the deal, a strong, well-defined brand enables publishers to go direct to market and compete against strongly branded booksellers—Amazon, Foyles, Tesco, Waterstone’s and W H Smith. Could other publishers have launched “Faber Finds” (“bringing great writing back into print”) with the same credibility?
So how can a publisher strengthen its brand? Strong visual identity is a good start—as Matthew Evans and Desmond Clarke realised many years ago at Faber. Single-minded publishing, with a willingness to say no to a good title which doesn’t fit with the brand (easier when it can be passed on to a sister imprint) is key—Yellow Jacket is a great example. Substantial and sustained investment is needed, but the benefits are clear.
Many food manufacturers have allowed their retail customers to become the brand of choice for consumers, and settled back to an anonymous supplying role. But the very strongest grocery brands have largely protected their margins from powerful retailers.
Comments on this article
By FZ
Is it literary snobbery that you've not mentioned Mills & Boon (and its imprints)? They are well known, marketed to specific audiences and as you say, this has enabled them to bypass strongly branded booksellers and sell direct to customers.22 Jul 08 14:51
By Alan Giles
Not literary snobbery but senility. You are absolutely right - Mills & Boon is one of the strongest examples, as is the Harlequin imprint in North America. Sorry for the oversight!22 Jul 08 15:52
See Also
Recent Blogs
- Still a good time for books
- A first-timer's Frankfurt
- Frankfurt: hot books 2008
- Miller's law
- A time for poetry
Most Active
- Dressed to sell
- Making publishing pay
- A token gesture
- Death of the publisher?
- Making writing pay
Latest Comments
- Jo you clearly don’t understand the seriousness of the book from the other side of the fence,...
- Cory: Dude, you keep doing it better than I expect. ...And you are making it tougher for...
- A, I fully respect your view about the seriousness of the book, but I would respect it far more...
- Boys need regular beatings, thats what learns 'em!
- 'a better place', has he died? Was thinking for a moment there that the book industry had taken...
RSS
Subscriber Content