News

« Headlines

Tokenism on Booker?

"Token Asian; Oirish misery novelist; another token Asian; Guardian woman; gay; token Australian wild-card with beard who looks definitely a bit foreign. Hmm. I wonder which of the usual suspects on the shortlist is going to win the Booker Prize this year," is how an opinion piece in today's Telegraph responds to the announcement of the Booker shortlist.

"I reckon that, too often, what our literary prize panels confuse with proper writing is in fact just overwriting, and that the problem is exacerbated by a salon of smug, sanctimonious, mostly Left-leaning literary-tastemakers (and gullible book groups) who feel a novel isn't "valid" unless it's a) a bit hard to read, b) weighed down with purple prose or poetry, c) socially worthy (madness, disability, child abuse etc) and d) best of all, imbued with lashings of fashionable, Zadie-Smith-style, melting-pot ethnic exoticism."

Telegraph

Add comment

By posting on this website you agree to the Bookseller Comments Policy. Comments go direct to live, please be relevant, brief and definitely not abusive. Report any "unsuitable" comments by clicking the links.

Name

Comment

Email

Comments on this article

By Sailtie

Wow! I know what they mean but they did leave out Rushdie for God's sake.

10 Sep 08 08:35

Unsuitable?

By Sour grapes

I'm not sure the Telegraph would recognise good writing if it bit them on the bum, judging by that piece.

10 Sep 08 09:16

Unsuitable?

By downbythebeach

Is everything tokenism if it's not written by someone British? The Telegraph could consider running their own prize, with entry by DNA test, and the prize being some kind of pie.

10 Sep 08 10:29

Unsuitable?

By Sour grapes

Eel pie.

10 Sep 08 10:48

Unsuitable?

See Also