You are viewing your 1 free article this month. Login to read more articles.
Kate Mosse joins parliamentarians to urge for AI reforms ahead of parliamentary debate
Parliamentarians and authors including Kate Mosse have raised significant concerns about the alleged theft of copyright on a mass scale by Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) firms, ahead of a debate next week.
Dozens of organisations and individuals have voiced their support for amendments tabled by Baroness Kidron to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, at an event on Monday (9th December) which would make UK copyright law enforceable. The amendments will be debated at Lords Committee Stage of the Data (Use and Access) Bill next Monday (16th) or Wednesday 18th December.
The amendments have been signed by Lord Clement-Jones, Liberal Democrat Lords spokesperson for science; Lord Stevenson, former Labour spokesperson for science, innovation and technology; and Lord Freyberg.
These amendments would make the UK’s existing copyright framework enforceable, empowering creative industries, media organisations and individual creators to decide whether their copyrighted work can be used to train Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. They would also enable creators to negotiate for fair terms when licensing their content. By fostering a dynamic market for creative content in GAI development, these measures would ensure that both the creative and tech sectors can flourish together.
Stakeholders such as Women’s Prize for Fiction founder, Mosse, have spoken out on the issue.
Mosse said: “Everyone is interested in how we can do things more efficiently. If there is no time for creators to create, there will be nothing to be data mined.
“As a writer, I want to engage with AI, and I do engage with AI. But we are looking for the F word – fairness. Copyright exists. Intellectual property exists. But the law is not being kept and there is a clear obfuscation of the law. If you say you want to be paid, it will seem you are dismissing AI. There is a deliberate blurring from tech firms.”
The bestselling novelist added: “What we need is not ‘opt-out’ – which won’t work because authors do not have the time. This solution would be a barrier to new creation in many ways. It will kill originality.
“In summary, don’t destroy copyright. Respect creators. Give us a seat at the table – we are not here to stop you. We embrace change. But if copyright is watered down, it will severely damage the creative industries and, without, there will be nothing left.”
As well as posing an existential threat to the UK’s world-leading creative industries, concerns have been raised that innovation in GAI could stagnate if businesses and creators are not properly rewarded for the use of their work. Without fair remuneration, they will be unable to continue producing the high-quality content that serves as the essential fuel for advanced GAI models.
Continues...
Read More
Baroness Kidron emphasised the urgent need for robust protections for creators.
She said: “Failing to pay for creative work is hollowing out our creative industries and preventing the next generation from contemplating a creative life. Our creative industries fuel our economy, sustain our soft power and bring us joy – an attack on it is an attack on all of us.
“This is an emergency, it is not time for a review, or putting the onus on rightsholders to opt-out. It is time to enforce the rule of existing UK law and protect one of our most valuable industries."
Baroness Kidron’s amendments would ensure that operators of web crawlers (internet bots that copy content to train AI) and AI firms themselves comply with existing UK copyright law.
These amendments would provide creators with crucial transparency regarding how their content is copied and used, ensuring tech firms are held to account in cases of copyright infringement.
Discussing the amendments, Matt Rogerson, director of global public policy and platform strategy at the Financial Times, said: “The vast majority of AI firms do not license for the content they use to train their models. New organisations are facing the worst of all worlds – their journalism is being taken for free and then used to substantiate journalistic products of no substantive value. And there is no way to stop this. This technology is only as good as the content it is trained on.
“These amendments would force AI firms to be transparent, provide proper control and enable news organisations to see who uses their content. A robust enforcement of these amendments will be critical to their success.”
The ammendments will be debated in the House of Lords next week. AI was widely discussed at a recent parliamentary event run by ALCS – and explored in its report on the issue – as well as The Bookseller’s recent FutureBook conference. Trade organisations such a the Publishers Association has also been campaigning for more legislation in the area.
